According to the Stedman's Dictionary euthanasia is defined as a quiet,painless death and the intentional putting to death by artificial means of persons with incurable painful disease. Pain and incurable illness are therefore predominant features in the euthanasia debate. In the United States of America the act of euthanasia is not recognised as under the American Model Penal Code (article 210:5) (Broady, Acker and Logan 2001), helping another to commit suicide is a criminal act. a famous quote said by Karl Brandt "Because God w never give us any pain that is unbearable." Euthanasia would not be legalized due to the religious reasons, declaration of medical development and slippery slope.
Religion has a major influence against euthanasia. Talking about people that have faith in God, euthanasia seems to be an illegal aspect, as it goes against the will of God to end one's life and also that it de means the value of life. Focusing more on a specific religion; Christianity uses phrase such as "Sanctity of Life" to justify that all human beings are to be valued, human life is sacred because it's gift from God. The famous philosopher Immanuel Kant said that human beings must value one; it doesn't depend on whether we are having a good life that we enjoy or whether we are making other people's lives better. We exist, so we have values and we have no rights to end our suffering by terminating our lives. Christians believe that life is a gift from God and that the sustaining and terminating of that life are equally under his control. Also that the fifth commandment states that "Thou Shall Not Kill." It is a specific command intended to protect the dignity and sanctity of human's life.
Another potential danger of the legislation of euthanasia is the declaration of the medical progress for palliative and hospice. Decreasing pain and suffering of the patient is one of the goals for the medical profession. If euthanasia was legalized commitment of doctors and nurses to saving lives would be undermined it will also discourage the search for the new cures and treatments for terminal illness (Jacob,2008). Furthermore, legislation of euthanasia could undermine the purpose of hospice. If euthanasia is performed legally then the number of patients in the hospice would dramatically decrease thus making no different from a hospital (Jared, 2010).
Furthermore voluntary euthanasia is actually the start of the slippery slope that leads to a non-voluntary euthanasia which would be categorised as murder. When euthanasia is carried out on a terminally ill patients without their approval, complications would arise; doctors would soon start killing their patients without their permission. When the patient is not really comprehending anything that the doctor is exactly saying, he suggest euthanasia and however it is done without the approval of the family members or the patient him/herself. This is where the slippery slope comes into the picture and also that the relationship between the doctor and the family members would cut off or end up bad. A famous Dr Jame Hawker said that "I can see no circumstances where a doctor is justified in actually killing a patient. We can and must relieve suffering in our patients, but this does not give us the right actually to kill them." The whole picture of euthanasia will eventually circumscribe the weak, disabled, demented and old. Making euthanasia legal could misuse where depressed people would euthanised themselves and a number of them would kill themselves.
Euthanasia shouldn't be legalized as people and doctors may misuse this law just because they cannot face their pain or depression. As long as there is a chance to live and the resistance to fight the question of euthanasia should not be brought up. So the question here is "do we have the right to die?"
Religion has a major influence against euthanasia. Talking about people that have faith in God, euthanasia seems to be an illegal aspect, as it goes against the will of God to end one's life and also that it de means the value of life. Focusing more on a specific religion; Christianity uses phrase such as "Sanctity of Life" to justify that all human beings are to be valued, human life is sacred because it's gift from God. The famous philosopher Immanuel Kant said that human beings must value one; it doesn't depend on whether we are having a good life that we enjoy or whether we are making other people's lives better. We exist, so we have values and we have no rights to end our suffering by terminating our lives. Christians believe that life is a gift from God and that the sustaining and terminating of that life are equally under his control. Also that the fifth commandment states that "Thou Shall Not Kill." It is a specific command intended to protect the dignity and sanctity of human's life.
Another potential danger of the legislation of euthanasia is the declaration of the medical progress for palliative and hospice. Decreasing pain and suffering of the patient is one of the goals for the medical profession. If euthanasia was legalized commitment of doctors and nurses to saving lives would be undermined it will also discourage the search for the new cures and treatments for terminal illness (Jacob,2008). Furthermore, legislation of euthanasia could undermine the purpose of hospice. If euthanasia is performed legally then the number of patients in the hospice would dramatically decrease thus making no different from a hospital (Jared, 2010).
Furthermore voluntary euthanasia is actually the start of the slippery slope that leads to a non-voluntary euthanasia which would be categorised as murder. When euthanasia is carried out on a terminally ill patients without their approval, complications would arise; doctors would soon start killing their patients without their permission. When the patient is not really comprehending anything that the doctor is exactly saying, he suggest euthanasia and however it is done without the approval of the family members or the patient him/herself. This is where the slippery slope comes into the picture and also that the relationship between the doctor and the family members would cut off or end up bad. A famous Dr Jame Hawker said that "I can see no circumstances where a doctor is justified in actually killing a patient. We can and must relieve suffering in our patients, but this does not give us the right actually to kill them." The whole picture of euthanasia will eventually circumscribe the weak, disabled, demented and old. Making euthanasia legal could misuse where depressed people would euthanised themselves and a number of them would kill themselves.
Euthanasia shouldn't be legalized as people and doctors may misuse this law just because they cannot face their pain or depression. As long as there is a chance to live and the resistance to fight the question of euthanasia should not be brought up. So the question here is "do we have the right to die?"